<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Climb to the Stars - Latest Comments in Thoughts&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://ctts.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ctts.disqus.com/thoughts8230/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2001 07:46:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Thoughts&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2001/09/17/thoughts-2/#comment-1770994</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The more I listen to what Bush says on TV, the more I get the impression &lt;br&gt;that he is not trying to calm down people, but that he keeps on &lt;br&gt;dramatizing. Does anybody else have the same opinion?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tara</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2001 07:46:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2001/09/17/thoughts-2/#comment-1770993</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A comment on bush's carreer prospects... one piece on &lt;a href="http://CNN.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="CNN.com"&gt;CNN.com&lt;/a&gt; observed &lt;br&gt;that war leaders are normally not reelected after a war because public &lt;br&gt;opinion swings the other way once piece is acheived. The examples given &lt;br&gt;were Churchill and Bush Sr. In any case Bush and his handlers would have &lt;br&gt;to be insane to start a war in afghanistan (or anywhere) for political &lt;br&gt;reasons.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davec</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2001 06:13:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2001/09/17/thoughts-2/#comment-1770992</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While we're at it, there is another thing that bugs me: people marvel at &lt;br&gt;the fact that this attack is "bringing the world together", that the US &lt;br&gt;and NY are showing so much solidarity...&lt;br&gt; It's true, of course, but it's such a normal phenomenon. Facing a common &lt;br&gt;ennemy brings people together. It is a common tactic used to solidify &lt;br&gt;groups. There is nothing to marvel about, it's a human reaction.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tara</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2001 02:53:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2001/09/17/thoughts-2/#comment-1770991</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I completely agree with you, but I am still reeling from people's &lt;br&gt;outbursts when I stated opinions similar to yours.  There has been a &lt;br&gt;massive outpouring of patriotism here, and people are highly charged on &lt;br&gt;the issue.  No one is thinking rationally, and they are more than willing &lt;br&gt;to ostracize you if you disagree.  Those of us who question the &lt;br&gt;government's actions have suddenly been reduced to the status of &lt;br&gt;"Un-American."  It's scary and intimidating.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephanie</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2001 17:06:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>