<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Climb to the Stars - Latest Comments in Stephanie Has a Newsletter</title><link>http://ctts.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ctts.disqus.com/stephanie_has_a_newsletter/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 04:08:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Stephanie Has a Newsletter</title><link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/08/31/stephanie-has-a-newsletter/#comment-1974172</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, no -- I've been thinking of doing it since Going Solo Lausanne, approximately. The Going Solo newsletter showed me how useful e-mail still was. And it was mainly a chat with Martin that decided me. Now... maybe Jason was in the backdrop somewhere, who knows -- but not that I'm aware.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Different tools reach different audiences and encourage different voices. Blogs do not make e-mail obsolete, anymore than Twitter makes blogs obsolete. New tools redefine the space the old ones occupy, but don't eradicate them. That is what my panel at BlogTalk was about: &lt;a href="http://www.viddler.com/explore/steph/videos/42/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.viddler.com/explore/steph/videos/42/"&gt;http://www.viddler.com/expl...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephanie Booth</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 04:08:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stephanie Has a Newsletter</title><link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/08/31/stephanie-has-a-newsletter/#comment-1974159</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Could it be inspired by Jason Calacanis' recent move? (without the whole "I'm leaving the blogosphere" drama-queen banter)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Xavier</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 04:02:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>