<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Climb to the Stars - Latest Comments in Seesmic Doubts</title><link>http://ctts.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ctts.disqus.com/seesmic_doubts/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 23:03:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Seesmic Doubts</title><link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2007/10/17/seesmic-doubts/#comment-1777024</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The ability to take a quick look in the video is a minus.  I just did a Seesmic post today on the need for tags (and categories) since it's so hard to tell what stuff is about.  You can't even have much of a description and the titles get cut off (not much info for the search engines either).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">garylapointe</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 23:03:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Seesmic Doubts</title><link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2007/10/17/seesmic-doubts/#comment-1777021</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It actually is also easier to write twits while e.g. at work than to record a video. I watched some of Loic's video and he seems to have trouble himself to get motivated for the one video per day.. And Twitter is not about one tweet a day but about well, 100s? ;-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But we will see :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christian Scholz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:40:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Seesmic Doubts</title><link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2007/10/17/seesmic-doubts/#comment-1777023</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Never thought about this issue, but this seems so obvious : it's easier to read twitts than to watch videos. Especially if you follow many friends.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let's hope Seesmic is not only a video-twitter (and I guess it's not).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By the way, I've discovered your blog lately and I just want to say : très bon blog, merci ! :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julien</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 08:48:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Seesmic Doubts</title><link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2007/10/17/seesmic-doubts/#comment-1777022</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I completely second your comment, that was also my first thought when reading the TechCrunch post. Youtube "conversations" give a clear idea of what makes sense in this area - and it does not include quick and reactive exchanges on daily activities. Things may evolve, but for now it sounds like it's a "twitter works, online video is a hit, so let's do twitter on video" kind of idea.&lt;br&gt;Video FaceBook anyone?  :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NatC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:04:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>