-
Website
http://climbtothestars.org -
Original page
http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2007/10/17/seesmic-doubts/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Dan Dickinson
4 comments · 1 points
-
Scott Jarkoff
4 comments · 5 points
-
michelv
3 comments · 1 points
-
Thejesh GN
2 comments · 3 points
-
aqualung
12 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
I completely second your comment, that was also my first thought when reading the TechCrunch post. Youtube "conversations" give a clear idea of what makes sense in this area - and it does not include quick and reactive exchanges on daily activities. Things may evolve, but for now it sounds like it's a "twitter works, online video is a hit, so let's do twitter on video" kind of idea.
Video FaceBook anyone? :-)
Never thought about this issue, but this seems so obvious : it's easier to read twitts than to watch videos. Especially if you follow many friends.
Let's hope Seesmic is not only a video-twitter (and I guess it's not).
By the way, I've discovered your blog lately and I just want to say : très bon blog, merci ! :)
It actually is also easier to write twits while e.g. at work than to record a video. I watched some of Loic's video and he seems to have trouble himself to get motivated for the one video per day.. And Twitter is not about one tweet a day but about well, 100s? ;-)
But we will see :-)
The ability to take a quick look in the video is a minus. I just did a Seesmic post today on the need for tags (and categories) since it's so hard to tell what stuff is about. You can't even have much of a description and the titles get cut off (not much info for the search engines either).