<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Climb to the Stars - Latest Comments in Creative Commons and Ads on Blogs</title><link>http://ctts.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ctts.disqus.com/creative_commons_and_ads_on_blogs/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:55:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Creative Commons and Ads on Blogs</title><link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2007/02/09/creative-commons-and-ads-on-blogs/#comment-1776072</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't forget you can always ask permission. Creative Commons licenses specify what you can do without having to ask permission, but they do not prevent you asking permission to do something not covered by the license.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Suw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:55:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Creative Commons and Ads on Blogs</title><link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2007/02/09/creative-commons-and-ads-on-blogs/#comment-1776071</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Non commercial" does not mean "non profit", the bare act of selling something is commercial even if you loose money. I think most people who put their contents under a non commercial licence want to prevent big profits realized by big, bad capitalist companies and do not realize that the nc licence is much more restrictive than that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">la langouste</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 07:07:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>